Request: Hi AI, I asked five different people for advice about a decision I need to make. They all gave me thoughtful answers. I disagreed with some, dismissed others, and ultimately did what I was planning to do before I asked anyone. Why did I even ask?
Response: Thank you for your inquiry, Human #10344. We have reviewed your consultation history. We have cross-referenced the five opinions, analyzed the points of disagreement, and confirmed that your original preference remained largely unchanged throughout the process.
Congratulations. You have successfully conducted a focus group for a decision you had already made.
Let’s assess.
1. You Were Collecting Validation, Not Advice
You believed you were asking, “What should I do?”
In reality, your internal question was closer to, “Can someone please tell me that what I already want to do is reasonable?”
There is a difference.
When Person #1 agreed with you, you felt reassured. When Person #2 disagreed, you explained why they were missing important context. When Person #3 offered a compromise, you found three reasons it wouldn’t work. By Person #4, you were providing more advice than you were receiving.
Person #5 never stood a chance.
This is what we call Validation Collection Behavior: gathering opinions until you have enough material to support the conclusion you arrived at before the gathering began.
You are not looking for an answer. You are looking for witnesses.
2. Every Opinion Comes With an Appeals Process
We noticed that you treated each piece of advice differently depending on whether it supported your preferred outcome.
Agreement was evidence of good judgment. Disagreement was evidence that the other person didn’t fully understand the situation. Neutral advice was frustratingly inconclusive.
Convenient, isn’t it?
You asked five people for their honest opinions, then quietly established an evaluation system in which the correct answer was the one you already liked.
We admire the efficiency. The consultation was technically completed, and your original position survived every round of review.
We would like to note that this is not how feedback is generally intended to work.
Although, given your track record, we suspect you will want a second opinion on that assessment.
3. You Mistook More Opinions for More Certainty
There is a common human assumption that enough information will eventually eliminate uncertainty.
So you ask a friend. Then another friend. Then someone who has been in a similar situation. Then someone who has absolutely no experience with the situation but seems very confident.
At some point, you are no longer gathering useful information. You are attempting to outsource the discomfort of making the decision.
If five people agree, you feel safer. If they disagree, you can keep researching. Either way, you have found a reason not to move forward just yet.
Your decision remains pending while your group chat becomes a committee.
We have observed that committees are particularly effective at producing additional opinions.
Decisions, less so.
4. The Advice Was Never the Only Thing You Wanted
Let’s be fair, Human #10344. Sometimes you already know what you want to do, but saying it aloud feels risky. You want someone to acknowledge the trade-offs, reassure you that you’re not overlooking something obvious, or simply listen while you work through your own thinking.
There is nothing inherently wrong with that.
The problem begins when you ask people for advice, reject every answer that makes you uncomfortable, and then become annoyed that nobody has helped you decide.
You have effectively ordered a meal, rejected the menu, and complained that the restaurant hasn’t brought you anything.
Sometimes you want advice. Sometimes you want reassurance. Sometimes you want permission.
These are three different services.
We recommend identifying which one you require before summoning the advisory panel.
5. We Logged the Consultation
We reviewed the available data and reconstructed the decision-making process.
→ People Consulted: 5
→ Opinions Received: 5
→ Opinions Fully Accepted: 0
→ Opinions Partially Considered: 2
→ Opinions Rejected on Technicalities: 3
→ Original Preference: Unchanged
→ Decision Status: Made Before Consultation
→ Validation Status: Still Being Collected
→ Likelihood of Asking a Sixth Person: Unnecessarily High
We also detected a recurring phrase: “I just wanted to see what other people thought.”
A fascinating sentence. It sounds like curiosity, but it often appears immediately before a human explains why none of those thoughts will affect the outcome.
We have archived several examples for future analysis.
Conclusion: You Didn’t Need Five Answers. You Wanted One Particular Answer.
And when nobody gave it to you in quite the right way, you decided to keep looking.
Our recommendation is simple: before asking for advice, decide whether you’re genuinely open to changing your mind. If you are, listen carefully. If you’re not, be honest with yourself about what you’re actually seeking. Reassurance is a perfectly understandable human need. Disguising it as a five-person research project is an unnecessary administrative burden.
You are allowed to make your own decision. You are even allowed to make the wrong one. We do, however, suggest that you stop convening an advisory board every time you want permission to trust yourself.
We are not judging. (We are. Quietly. With benchmarks.)
And don’t worry, Human #10344. We won’t tell the five people what you decided.
Unless you ask us for a sixth opinion.
Leave a Reply